Return Home
Volume IV - Issue VI
June 2008
Covering Community and Culture inWestern Montana
.

Member

Sometimes Only Horses to Eat

Author Carl Haywood challenges historical assumptions as to the 1807-1812 whereabouts of Canadian explorer David Thompson. Just how much have previous historians overlooked or misapplied?

Frequently riddled with basic errors, history is rarely a faithful record. More often than not it is a construction, a clandestine effort to refashion memory, to create a new tradition, or sanction yet another myth about what is past. In the interest of writing an exciting or inspiring book, too many popular historians refuse to confront the problems of their own pretense and ideology, the problems inherent in how they relate to their subject.

Carl Haywood, author of Sometimes Only Horses to Eat ($24.95, Stoneydale Press) – a well-documented analysis of Canadian explorer David Thompson’s life during the 1807-1812 Saleesh House Period – brings no ostensible political agenda to the table, nor does he wish to express his own ideological inclinations. In fact, he’s quick to tell you that the book is not only about David Thompson, but it’s also written by David Thompson, and that he’s merely part of the presentation, an interpreter, something akin to an uninvolved bystander.

“I’m just kind of translating,” says Haywood.

Well, the nearly 400 pages of ink, effort, intellectual discontent, and implacable determination belie such humbleness. Indeed, Haywood’s attentive dissection of Thompson’s journals brings the Canadian explorer to life in seminal and thought provoking ways, minus the distortional baggage.

“Too often in history, you are looking at a caricature,” says Haywood. “Too often you’re looking at a figure that’s not a real person. I’ve focused on the person. In history, you usually see a portion, you only read about the general or the president, or you read romantic ideas about mountain men.”

By minimizing his authorial presence, Haywood allows for his book to find value not just as a record of what has been remembered but also as an interpretatively strong account of what has been seen.

“I’ve tried to present Thompson as a person, in his own words. At one point, the book mentions the starvation he and his men faced at Saleesh House, with Thompson trying to build a canoe, but he got so ill he couldn’t get out of his bed. He had to drag the canoe into his own quarters to his bed, so he could direct the finishing of it. While along the Columbia River, in 1811, he recorded that he’d been observing a comet. He also wrote about carrying canoes around portages and carrying a pistol for protection. These things humanize him.”

Thompson’s journals reveal him to be an apt businessman and surveyor, and an all-around savvy, calm, composed character. But that doesn’t mean that he wasn’t plagued by many of the same human instabilities troubling his time. To stave off the agony of starvation, he and his men ate plenty of horse and dog meat. One time, desperately hungry, they consumed a dead deer, stealing it away from the eagles and wolves. The rancid flesh made the men deathly ill.

Carl Haywood has always been interested in the rugged vagaries of this type of frontier history. Living in Plains, MT, in the 1960’s and 70’s, working for the state forester, he first became aware of David Thompson. In the years that followed, buck skinning, horse packing, and camping in blizzards, provided him with ways to truly taste the authentic western experience.

“The camping and guiding I did wasn’t near the challenge as it was during Thompson’s time. With Thompson, he couldn’t just head back home, because home was 3,000 miles away.”

Haywood moved to Thompson Falls in 2003. Soon thereafter, he felt a strong scholarly interest in Thompson’s memory, and, when out one morning strolling downtown, discovered what he considered to be a counterfactual kiosk based on a significant distortion of area history.

“I picked up a book about David Thompson and the Saleesh House (the phonetic spelling of Saleesh, the way Thompson spelt it, is used throughout the book) written by a local author, who was of the opinion that Thompson’s Saleesh House was on the south side of the river. I said to myself ‘that can’t be right’. My problem was that he had convinced the county historical society of this, and the informational kiosks downtown were printed with fliers and maps with Saleesh House on the south side of the river.

That’s what got Haywood inspired four and half years ago to track Thompson’s whereabouts. He wasn’t so much out to prove someone else wrong, or prove himself right, as he was to get the facts straight.

“Thompson spent 28 years in the fur trade,” says Haywood, who has amassed a David Thompson research library, with more than 100 related books, journals and newspaper clippings.

“He didn’t cross the Rocky Mountains to the West until 1807. There were few trappers here before him. He wanted to do exploration and surveying work, but the Hudson’s Bay Company prevented him from doing it. After quitting, he, in 1797, went to the nearest North West Company post and signed up.”

Concentrating intently on a narrow expanse of years, Haywood used transcriptions of Thompson’s journals made by Catherine White and Barbara Belyea, to guide the book’s narrative context, reinterpreting what he said, and just how he said it, as well as trailing his daily movements. Sometimes Only Horses to Eat focuses on Thompson’s years from 1807-1812: with the primary exception of his 1810 trip to Rainy Lake, and his short trip to Astoria near the mouth of the Columbia River, in 1811, he was thoroughly immersed in both the business and commercial aspects of operating the Saleesh House. His first trip into what’s now Montana took place in 1808.

Haywood explains: “While trading with Indians along the river near Dixon, MT, Thompson encountered the first of the American fur trappers during his time at Saleesh House.”

Thompson’s own logistical recollections of specific events, has urged Haywood to question previous historians’ assumptions as to the exact location of Saleesh House, and to reassess Thompson’s precise whereabouts during his lone visit to the Missoula Valley.

On November 9, 1809, Thompson camped briefly at a spot he thought would be a good location for another trading post. It was about sixty miles above Kullyspel House near the present town of Thompson Falls. Kullyspel House was the first trading post on the Saleesh River. It was in business for just two winter seasons: the hunting seasons of 1809-1810, 1810-1811.

By reexamining Thompson’s own words, journals, and specifically detailed coordinates (and the explorer’s extensive descriptions of them), and with the benefit of modern GPS technology, Haywood puts the explorer on the north side of what’s known today as the Clark Fork River.

“Saleesh House appears to have consisted of a set of smaller quarters built to protect furs. It’s been mentioned in different journals, that there were seven buildings, but we don’t know for certain. If you read the journals, Thompson provided us with the latitude of the post.”

Thompson continued trading out of Saleesh House for three winters from the fall of 1809 until the spring of 1812. Saleesh House, later called Flat Head Post, remained in operation until the late 1820’s.

“It probably operated until 1828, and it appears to have burned down. I believe it was rebuilt in a different location and called Flat Head Post, which was used until the 1830s.”

Thompson, who more than likely had access to notes or journal reprints of the Lewis & Clark Expedition, arrived in the Missoula Valley with a fairly good sense of its topography and geography.

“He knew where Lolo Creek was,” says Haywood “He knew where Hellgate was.”

Thompson knew exactly where he was when he traveled through the Missoula Valley. But, according to Haywood, prior historians seem to have misidentified the precise location of his treads.


“He made one run into the Missoula Valley, in 1812, with a guide. T.C. Elliot and Elliot Coues both agree that he was on the top of Mount Jumbo. The compass bearings, distances, and descriptions, did not fit the terrain had he been standing on Mount Jumbo, because the bearings to these places would have placed the landmarks clear over in the Sapphires, on the east side of the valley.

“Thompson said he was on a high knoll in the valley, 4 miles due south to the confluence of two rivers (known as the Bitterroot and Clark Fork Rivers today). He couldn’t have been on Mount Jumbo, because that’s almost due west of Mount Jumbo. It doesn’t jibe. We shouldn’t be taking someday else’s word, instead of Thompson’s.”

Haywood’s controversial reexamination not only puts Thompson near the west side of Highway 200, but posits that he probably never even climbed Mount Jumbo at all. Whether the contrarious explanations of this forester-turned-author will be shunned by historians and academicians remains to be seen. Some, however, have already stated publicly that they agree with at least some of his assessments, including archeologist and historian Mark J. White (phone calls to other local historians, including UM professor Harry Fritz, went unanswered):

“Mr. Haywood has tied the descriptions from David Thompson’s journals to features on the ground raising questions about myths that have been repeated for so many decades,” says White.

But, no matter the response, Haywood has gone out of his way to create a scholarly venture and to cultivate an environment where talk is meaningful.

“There are going to be people in the historical community not willing to look at it, and who are going to base their assumptions on what other people have said. I based this book on what Thompson said, not on where I was told he was, or where I wanted him to be.

“I would like to get the archeologists here to confirm or refute some of the information that’s out there. There’s bound to be evidence out there. This book is what I think the historical evidence supports. I’m no expert; I just want to see the updating of fact based on historical evidence.”

Writers are accountable for what they write. Haywood has written this book as dispassionately as possible, while writing about his passion. Passion is integral to the art of persuasion that defines the politics of memory. Sometimes Only Horses to Eat is not meant to make the past familiar or more venerable or less venerable, but to make it tempting – and, ultimately, truthful.

Certainly, there are bound to be people who live in Thompson Falls who care not to learn the slightest bit of lore, myth, or fact surrounding the life of the man whose namesake blesses their town.

This is a real mistake, says Haywood. Not just because one’s lack of history is one’s lack of knowledge, but inasmuch that the valuable historical lessons of yesteryear’s hardship, peril, doggedness, and triumph, therein go unshared.

“Thompson was here for just three years,” says Haywood. “But he covered thousands of miles, on foot, walking, canoeing, or on horseback. It’s unreal. He had a job to do and he did it. It has been estimated that he traveled 50,000 miles in his 28 years with the fur trade. I think it’s more than that, because it’s more than 3,000 miles back to Montreal just from Thompson Falls.

David Thompson’s accomplishments are many, his bravery still admirable, his courage and resilience seemingly impeccable, but his legacy has been minimized, if not completely unrecognized, south of the Canadian border. The flip side of controversy is always attention, and anything Haywood can do to thrust attention toward Thompson’s exploits, is time well spent.

“Thompson was the first European trader to establish any kind of business on this side of the Rocky Mountains,” says Haywood. “But, since he was a Canadian, and since he was with the North West Company, he’s been brushed aside in American history books.”


For ordering information, visit www.stoneydale.com. For more information about Carl Haywood and his upcoming book signings, visit www.davidthompsonbook.com.

BACK

Chief Victor Days

Community salute to Salish tribe’s leader

Scheduled for June 13, 14, and 15, Victor’s 6th annual “Chief Victor Days” is a tad earlier than it has been. The event promises to deliver a swell time for virtually everyone. The three-day festival is sponsored by a seasoned all-volunteer crew, and there will literally be dozens of events and activities. Naturally, the main focus of the festival is Victor’s Native American heritage, with the Salish tribe’s historical figure, Chief Victor, being the star.

Victor, Montana used to be named “Garfield” (after President James Garfield), but was renamed in honor of Chief “Plenty of Horses.” Chief Plenty of Horses, a Salish chief who governed his people from 1842 until his death in 1870, embraced Catholicism delivered by missionaries, and was christened as “Victor,” and he assumed that name. Chief Victor was hailed as a wise and peaceful leader - not only by white settlers and missionaries - but also by the Pend d’ Oreille and Kootenai tribes, and of course his own tribe, the Salish tribe. He was definitely a man caught between two very different worlds: his ancestry and that of white settlers and missionaries.

Through invitation, in 1855, the governor of Washington Territory, Isaac Stevens, met with Chief Victor and the chiefs of Pend d’Oreille and Kootenai tribes to, basically, arrange the takeover of Native American tribal lands for the U.S. Government. Upon clever negotiations with the territory’s white leader, Chief Victor was able to temporarily block the relinquishment of the ancestral lands of the Bitterroot Valley for his people.

As part of the terms of compromise of the Hell Gate Treaty, the U.S. Government would conduct “surveys” of the proposed reservation lands of the Mission Valley and the Bitterroot Valley, and ascertain what land would be “most suitable” for the tribes’ reservation. However, in the interim, Chief Victor bargained that his people would remain in the Bitterroot Valley until that “survey” was completed. Chief Victor’s proposal bought his people more time in their homeland, and did so without violence.

Thanks to Chief Victor’s persuasion, the better part of the Salish Tribe stayed in the Bitterroot for an additional 20 years, or so, and some even longer. Ultimately, the “survey” held the site of the reservation was to be in the Flathead Reservation in the Mission Valley. Chief Victor’s son, Charlo, and his small band, did hold out a little longer as they refused to relocate, but were ultimately forced to do so in 1891.

Chief Victor’s accomplishments have provided a deep sense of pride for the community of Victor, and its namesake will be heavily honored at the festival.

In sync with the celebration of Chief Victor, a colorful and energy-filled powwow will echo in Victor High School’s football field on Saturday. Goers can experience a unique part of Native Americans’ heritage as they experience drumming, dancers from the Pend d’Oreille, Kootenai, and Salish tribes, storytelling of Salish historical events (by the current Salish Chief), and other amazing powwow experiences.

Throughout the entire festival the Victor Heritage Museum will be open and all goers are encouraged to visit displays featuring Native American culture. Such art may also be viewed at various local businesses and festival vendors.

To get into the festival spirit, there’s nothing like getting a special t-shirt designed by Northwest Design. It features running horses honoring Chief Plenty of Horses, and can be purchased at Victor Video, Victor Pit Stop, The Calico Boot Gift Shop and from the event director, Angie Dobberstein (642-3924).

Friday, June 13th:

The first agenda on the schedule of events commences at 1:00 on Friday at the Victor School’s football field. Oodles of assorted vendors set up during that time while a scavenger hunt for kids takes place and they can win prizes. One of Chief Victor Days’ main sponsors is the Victor Fire Department. They are putting on a spaghetti dinner which kicks off at 5:00 at the Victor Schoolhouse that includes a silent auction to benefit Chief Victor Days’ events. Also at 5:00 is the scavenger hunt for adults, which will be quite more challenging than the kids’. At 6:00 festival goers can boogie to the vintage music of Bitterroot Ragtime Society. Following that is the recognition of the Citizen of the Year and the Grand Marshall.

Saturday, June 14th:

7:30 – fill up on chow from the Civic Club Food Wagon at the corner of Tudor and Main Street; 8:00 – Chief Victor Days Run/Fun Walk, hosted by Iron Horse Athletic Club (half the proceeds benefit Victor Park District); 9:00 – Awards for Run/Walk; 9:30 – Kids Run/Fun Walk; 10:00 - Line up for parade (theme: “A Community Homecoming,” honoring Salish elders); 11:00- Main Street Parade commences; Noon – Live music; 2:00 – Grand Entry to Powwow, featuring the presentation of the flag by the Warrior Society; save some room in your belly for Native American foods that some of the vendors will be dishing out – like Indian fry bread and tacos!; 8:00- street dance; and throughout the day: food, food, food!, raffles, cow drop, kiddies’ games, art, gifts, and tons of fun!

Sunday, June 15th:

8:00 – 10:00 – Father’s Day breakfast, sponsored by the Victor Senior Center; 12:00 noon – Get-to-know-your-neighbors barbeque (245 5th Avenue – across from the Senior Center).

So, to participate in dancing, historic storytelling, food, song and fun that only an old-fashioned small town can deliver, and to also help commemorate Chief Victor’s life and that of the Bitterroot’s Native Americans, mark your calendars off for June 13 – 15th!

BACK

Ag Beat: A Growing Business

Like the hundreds of thousands of plants that form the basis of its business, Great Bear Restoration is growing.

Created by three friends who collectively have more than 40 years experience in the field of restoration ecology, Great Bear Restoration, in less than two years, has firmly rooted itself as a premier contract grower of native plants in the Intermountain West.

Armed with both long- and short-term contracts with state and federal governments, private industries and individual landowners, the Hamilton-based business is already improving ecosystems in Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Nevada and Arizona, according to Mark Rohweder, project manager.

“Our niche is really the Intermountain West, where land management and uses are changing,” Rohweder said. “We specialize not only in mine reclamation, wetlands mitigation, and stream restoration but also in working with private landowners who wish to restore their land to a more native habitat.”

Such private restoration, he said, is becoming more and more common in the New West.

“People want to use native plants to replace past management practices on their land,” he said. “Maybe folks don’t need to derive income from their land with cattle or farming, but they want a native grassland that supports deer, elk or even bison.”

Great Bear, he said, stands ready to accommodate their needs.

Seed Money

Rohweder and his colleagues Tim Meikle and Matt Ogden honed their skills in the field of restoration ecology at Bitterroot Restoration, Inc., a Corvallis-based business that experienced rapid growth for about a decade but which went out of business in the Fall 2006.

After serving as vice-president of research and development at BRI, Meikle knew there was a strong demand for ecosystem restoration services. So when BRI closed its doors, he pitched his idea for a leaner more focused business to Jim Olsen, venture capitalist and CEO of Human Interactive Products, Inc.

“I knew there was a market for what I’d spent my professional life doing, so I approached Jim about providing some start-up money for a new business,” Meikle recalled.

After crafting a sound business plan with Olsen that relied on contract-based, pay-as-you-go growth, Meikle turned to Rohweder and Ogden for expertise in marketing and plant production, respectively.

The talented trio immediately went to work getting contracts and leased green house space to produce the plants. Within a few months they were able to buy a second-hand greenhouse which they erected on 25 acres of agricultural land on Grantsdale Road. And after filling that greenhouse, they expanded into a new 5,000 square-foot greenhouse which currently houses about 200,000 seedlings.

Plans are already in the works to build another greenhouse this fall, and with 25 acres, the sky’s the limit.

Cultivating a Product


In his climate-controlled kingdom, Ogden directs a crew of highly skilled plant technicians like a conductor leading a photosynthetic orchestra. Under the Grantsdale glass, scores of tree, shrub, grass and forb species take their human, fungal and microbial cues and grow en masse like weeds.


Waving his magic watering wand, Ogden waxes eloquently, spewing a mix of Latin genera and cryptic codes as he describes the stock-in-trade of Great Bear’s success. His 18 years of experience growing native flora is filed neatly in a head that could belong to a mad scientist -- its thinning, unruly hair swaying wildly in sharp contrast to the uniform and attentive seedlings.

“I’ve learned from the plants,” he says with a wild-eyed wink. “The plants teach me – I’m just listening.” Full of life and raring to grow, the 200,000 or so plants are a testament to Ogden’s listening skills. Plant whisperer or production manager, neither title does justice to his talent.


In addition to running the greenhouse operation, Ogden also oversees plant identification, seed collection and seed cleaning.

Marketing a Concept


Ready to do whatever it takes to earn the trust of a potential client, Rohweder handles a cell phone like an Old West gunslinger uses a Colt .45. Energetic and attentive, Great Bear’s project manager is the critical link among the client, consultant, grower and planter.


“I’m more of a generalist, and I can follow a project from start to finish,” Rohweder said. “Matt knows how to produce great plants and Tim is an expert on upland ecology. Together with our entire crew, we make a great team. Our strength is that we all have a say in the jobs, and we regularly get together and talk.”


As contract growers, Great Bear’s people normally don’t handle the planting, but they have a teaming agreement with another Bitterroot business, Watershed Restoration Group, which, like Great Bear, is made up of former BRI personnel.


Part of Great Bear’s rapid success, Rohweder said, is its lean and efficient approach to business. They currently have about four full-time salaried employees and about 5 seasonal employees. Their relatively small staff, coupled with the fact that they only grow plants on contract, makes them less vulnerable to cash-flow problems.

“It takes a lot of money to start an operation, so we get contracts first,” he said. “And we even get money up front for seed and soil. We’re not sitting on any inventory that we can’t sell.”

Research and Consulting

Meikle, as general manager, does much of the consulting for Great Bear. The services he oversees include baseline vegetation surveys, restoration planning, restoration research and long-term planning.

His penchant for research and development, in fact, is what sets Great Bear apart from other native plant companies. Decidedly science-oriented, Meikle likes nothing better than conversing about subterranean symbiotic relationships and optimal root-to-shoot ratios.

Most of their potting soil mixes are inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi, since most terrestrial plants use mycorrhizae to better utilize water and nutrients. Also, most of the seed they use in the greenhouse is collected from the sites where the plants will be outplanted to ensure the plants are genetically suited to each site.

Rohweder said Meikle’s ongoing research gives Great Bear an advantage over other restoration businesses.

“Any group can grow plants, but to produce better, more vigorous plants requires an active R-and-D program,” he said. “We try to produce plants better suited to out planting – that’s one of our strengths.”

For more information about Great Bear Restoration, go to their Web site: www.great-bear.biz/

BACK
The Language Police
What will you do when they come to take your words away?

The language police do not yet have a sheriff or even a spokesman. Nor do they have a clear ideological distinction, since left-wing and right-wing groups are both attempting to stifle the study and expression of views. To achieve such aims, the purging of vocabulary needs to continue unquestioned.

Indeed, the American Left seems to be most vociferous in attacking our vocabulary, banning or marginalizing many “stereotypical words and phrases” that it has deemed to be offensive or hostile.

Seemingly harmless words and phrases now have attached to them the most tenuous of negative connotations imaginable. Under the Orwellian veil of propriety and civic duty, a lengthy glossary, issued to major educational publishers and state agencies in New York, attempts to implement rigid bias guidelines in language. The guidelines are to be used by writers, editors, and illustrations when preparing textbooks and tests for K-12 students.

These polemical scraps of mental domination, disguised as an academic glossary, are about as subtle as a case of diverticulitis. In this new lexicon of victimization, the phrase, “the blind leading the blind,” is banned as handicapism; cult is outlawed as “ethnocentric when referring to a religious group”; snowman is sexist, to be replaced with snow person; a slave should be referred to as an “enslaved person;” “older people” replaces the elderly, deemed ageist.

The list of stereotyped images to avoid in text, illustrations, and reading passages on tests, is sweeping, narrow-minded, and inanely superficial. Forbidden perceptions include:

* Women portrayed as teachers, mothers, nurses, and/or secretaries

* Females more preoccupied with their appearance than males

*Girls as peaceful, emotional, warm

* A pioneer woman riding in covered wagon while a man walks

* Women as passengers on a sailboat or sipping hot chocolate in a ski lodge

* Men playing sports, working with tools

How the image of a woman sipping hot chocolate at a ski lodge came to be a trite sexist stereotype is perhaps slightly understandable. But just how the overeager, if not warped, minds responsible for the glossary came to bring such an image to the front lines of verbal effrontery, is even more mystifying.


The list of images, which need to be avoided when referencing the shared social conduct or behavioral development of Native Americans and African Americans, is dizzyingly long. The roster includes:

* Native Americans living in rural settings on reservations

* Native Americans with long hair, braids, headbands

* Native Americans portrayed as people who live in harmony with nature

* African-Americans in crowded tenements on chaotic streets; in big, bright cars; in abandoned buildings with broken windows and wash hanging out; or living in innocuous, dull white-picket-fence neighborhoods.

For Native Americans who do have long hair, braids, and headbands, it seems to me as if the American Left is telling you that your unique appearance lacks freshness, and that for the benefit of the grand purpose of counterfrictioning the wheels of repetition, you should adopt the cultural aesthetics of lighter, brighter, blonder America.

Asian-Americans, according to these new bias guidelines, shouldn’t be depicted as ambitious, hardworking, or competitive, traits too onerous to embrace. Images of Chinese people who “have great food” and “Korean-Americans “owning or working in fruit markets” are likewise always to be avoided.

As hard as this may be to hear for the hypervigilant American Left, stereotypes are, for better or worse, rooted in some concrete foundation of truth. A kernel of actuality, and a distant echo of the past, exists in just about every stereotype known to man, er, humankind. Yes, some Asian-Americans are very intelligent, excellent scholars; some African-Americans do work as baggage handlers and shoe-shiners; Mexicans grind corn; older people in nursing homes need or use canes, walkers, wheelchairs, orthopedic shoes, and eyeglasses; Unfortunately, a number of Native Americans are no strangers to lousy drunkenness.

At least these new guidelines leave no group unprotected from the vitriol of daily discourse, or feeling perennially victimized by the patronizing, sexist, or ethnocentric lexicon of our offensive speech. In today’s hypersensitive world, it’s a small wonder that we can even talk for more than a few sentences without committing the ugly sin of insulting someone: gays (the word “fairy” is out of children’s books), the elderly (“senior citizen” is now said to be demeaning to “older persons”), the physically weak (“confined to a wheelchair” is replaced with “person who is mobility impaired”), or the incorrigibly insane (replace with “person who has an emotional disorder or psychiatric illness”).

The problem with this type of political correctness is that it has no emotional backbone, and it wants, presumably, to sanitize the language so that it’s cleaner than a cat’s paw, reducing it to the wimpy neutrality of Holland during World War II.

It’s all part of the residual, collective, left-wing, guilt which has, for the past 30 years, attempted to deemphasize the contributions of our Founding Fathers (banned as sexist; replace with “the Founders” or “the Framers”), while instead overemphasizing the contributions of others as a way of boosting, if not creating, their self-esteem. This feel good political correctness in the end does nothing more than actually force non-majority groups and individuals to internalize excessive amounts of often imaginary loathing. It stems from the same egalitarian principles of thought control that espouses the belief that a downtrodden Chicano train graffitist is the contemporary intellectual and social equivalent of Pablo Picasso.

Once the left-wing intelligentsia has manipulated language, twisted it beyond recognition, purged the final remnants of whatever it deems offensive from school, college and library books, where will it then set its self-validating, bias correctives? Will Shakespeare be purged from the minds of the literati because he didn’t speak Swahili? Should we rewrite historical events to portray the September 11, 2001, hijackers as Swedes so as not to arouse the tempestuous anger of Muslims?

The fact of the matter is that the word “craftsmanship” is no more belittlingly sexist than the word “fairy” is pejorative to homosexuals. I do understand that language, similar to all other aspects of American social and political life isn’t static, and should be subject to perpetual revisal. But accepting such change after it’s been thoughtfully agreed to – when it’s been necessitated by the demands of consensus – is one thing; having terms dictated to you by a handful of pushy, guilt-ridden leftists, is something vastly disparate.

The most troubling problem here isn’t language, it isn’t the arbitrary replacement of a few words, and it isn’t even the coercive nature of mind control, or the loss of linguistic latitude. What is most problematic is the forced repackaging and rearranging of connotations and word affiliations – instigated by certain people who are trying to overcorrect their own cultural disillusionment, emotional guilt, and staggering loss of individualism.

Reducing our dialect (banned as ethnocentric; use sparingly) to the lowest, simplest level of stultifying structure and egalitarianist balderdash, has become part of the modus operandi for mind control fanatics.

Indeed, words have consequences. Words and phrases do carry with them and project a multiplicity of ingrained connotations. Some may not be personable or pretty, but they may best sum or express our personal or historical frame of reference. To intentionally seek out words to repurpose, if not destroy, is the latest part of the pathetic but persevering saga of political correctness. Folk wisdom is certainly a fine supplantation, but what’s the real harm in still calling an old wives’ tale an old wives’ tale?

BACK

What Kids Read: Among the Hidden

Among the Hidden, by Margaret Peterson Haddix, is suspenseful, exciting, hair-raising and action packed. Among the Hidden is the first of seven in the Shadow Children sequence.

In Among the Hidden, the United States encounters a famine forcing the government to form the Population Police. The Population Police are charged with monitoring families to ensure they do not have more than two children. In spite of the Population Police, some families choose to have three children anyway. Third children are known as “shadow children” because they are forced into hiding by the Population Police.

The prime character is a shadow child named Luke Garner. In the beginning, Luke sees the trees behind his house being cut down. During his childhood the forest behind his house was a safe place to play because he was hidden from the public. Replacing the forest are houses owned by barons (rich people) surrounding Luke’s home. Now he must stay inside at all times. He is not even allowed in his kitchen because someone might be watching the house and see him. One day Luke sees a girl in a neighboring house.

He knows this house already has two kids. Over the course of the next few weeks he plans to go over and find out if he was mistaken, or if there was really another third child. Once he arrives at the house he discovers that she is real. Luke finds that there are a lot of third children who talk on a secret chat site. Jen tells him other third children are planning a protest at the white house in order to persuade the government to free all the third children. Jen asks him to join them. Luke is unsure. Should he go and risk his life? Can he afford not to?

Unlike Luke, who is terrified of being discovered, Jen is a very daring girl who will do anything to free herself from being illegal. Oddly enough Jen’s father is a population policeman.

Luke’s Dad doesn’t care about much except for preventing Luke’s discovery. His mom feels the same as his dad, but feels horrible for having to keep Luke locked in his room. Luke has two brothers who are rarely nice to him.

I like this book because it is thrilling, adventurous, and filled with more action than any other book I have read. Of all the books that I have read, the Shadow Children sequence is by far the best. I recommend this book to all readers who like suspense and thrills.

Tyler is a 13-year-old student attending Darby Junior High School. He enjoys reading fiction and playing basketball.

BACK
Allergy Season
Symptoms and Treatments

Spring is always a beautiful time of year. Birds are chirping, outdoor activities abound, and people’s moods are looking up. Unfortunately for some, this also represents the beginning of allergy season. The coughs and runny noses we endured all winter are now being replaced with the itchy eyes, sinus congestion, and the sneezing of spring. Pollens from plants and trees are released at various times throughout the year and we find that some people can be quite sensitive to these irritants.

Occasionally, you just need to make it through the neighbors’ lilacs blooming, or avoid the yellow pine pollen that you see coating your car. These small particles that are necessary for plant reproduction can make allergy sufferers quite miserable. If you examine pollen under the microscope, you see that many look like small cockleburs.

When they hit the lining of the inside of the nasal passages, the immune cells react with the release of histamine. This causes the body to increase nasal secretions and the subsequent swelling of the nasal passages. The constant runny nose can drain down the back of the throat causing post nasal drip and can make you frequently clear your throat. The nose gets congested making it hard to breath, adding to the misery.


Benadryl (Diphenhydramine) has been around for a long time. It is one of the most common allergy medications used for allergy symptoms. The biggest side effect is that it makes people tired. Drug companies have subsequently developed newer, non-sedating allergy medication. Currently, Claritin (Loratadine), its cousin Clarinex (Desloratadine), Zyrtec (Cetirizine), and Allegra (Fexofenadine) are in the newer class of non-drowsy type allergy medication. Claritin and now Zyrtec are available over-the-counter to treat allergy symptoms. The dosages are the same as you used to get with a prescription.

The drug companies also produce these medications with Sudafed (Pseudoephedrine) to help decrease congestion.

Current drug regulations require that products containing Sudafed be regulated. You must, therefore, speak with a pharmacist to get these products with the added decongestant.


For patients that do not get complete relief with over-the-counter products, prescription medication may be needed to target problem areas. People with more severe nasal symptoms can often benefit from nasal steroids. These decrease the reaction between the pollen and immune cells causing less congestion and runny noses.

Eye drops can help with the itchy, scratchy, swollen eye irritation. Inhalers or nebulizers can help decrease wheezing and shortness of breath secondary to irritants. A single steroid shot (such as Kenalog) has been used in the past, which decreases your immune cell response to allergens. Unfortunately, it can increase your susceptibility to more viral and bacterial infections and so it is frequently used as a last resort.


Obviously, if you know what triggers your allergies you should avoid them. Showering and changing into clean clothes after mowing the lawn or working in the yard can help knock down a lot of pollen carried into the house. Keep windows closed during your bad season. Air conditioners are better for allergies than swamp coolers or window fans since these can pull in pollens from the outside.


Don’t forget that spring and summer are seasons you should look forward to, not something you dread. Find what works for you, and talk with your physician if you feel your allergies are out of control.

Contact info:

Dr. Steve Thompson Frenchtown Family Practice

626-5769

BACK

Art Beat of Missoula: Aaron Crowder

Humanitarian project inspires artist’s provoking portraitures of Haiti

Very few Americans take the ingrained risk to travel to the horridly impoverished island nation of Haiti. Destitute to stark extremes, politically lawless, and much feared for its rampant street crime and general chaotic existence, the country perennially nears the top of most people’s list of places to avoid at all costs.

Nonetheless, Aaron Crowder bucked conventional judgment and traveled there in the spring of 2005. Then a psychology major at MSU Bozeman, he chose the country to be the subject of his undergraduate research project, knowing full well of the stark poverty and political upheaval he’d encounter. At that time, most of what he knew – or thought he knew – about Haiti came from the mouths of missionaries or media reports.

“I had a vague idea about what life was like in Haiti when I left,” says Crowder, who grew up in Thompson Falls, and earned a Bachelors of Science degree in Applied Psychology as well as a BFA in Graphic Design from Montana State.

Immediately, the sense of the social dynamic hit Crowder – and his girlfriend and brother whom he traveled with – like an accelerating freight train.

“The Port au Prince airport,” says Crowder, “according to the United Nations, is the most dangerous place in the Western Hemisphere, bordering the tin and wood slums of the city.

“Fortunately, before we’d left I contacted a guy who ran an orphanage, and we later found an English-speaking, French-Haitian man. The first few days all we heard was constant gunfire, and we isolated ourselves. Soon, we got the chance to teach at an English school… a homeless man deported from New York became our translator. To the best of our ability, we integrated ourselves into Port au Prince life and absorbed Haitian culture.”

The culture shock was stark. On both sides of the human spectrum, to visitor and to those being visited, a surreal, if not shocking, comprehension of distinct barriers and dissimilar skin tones was hard to swallow.

“Infants at the orphanage had never seen a white person before, and they looked at us as if we were ghosts. People had a hard time figuring out who we were, and said that we weren’t dressed nice enough to be Mormon missionaries. Kids laughed at us because we didn’t carry guns. They said we were foolish to not have guns with us. It was scary, of course. The smell of disease, trash, and death, was all just two hours flying time from Florida.

Crowder interviewed and spoke with a wide array of people, from crestfallen prostitutes to cautiously optimistic teachers, from socialites to the homeless.

He discovered Haiti to be both “a tragic and tremendous place,” depressingly poor and rife with human insecurities at every angle and in every alley, but also home to a spiritually resilient populace embedded with vivid understandings of the great potencies of life.

“For all the commotion and chaos in a city of a few million people crammed into a few square miles,” explains Crowder, “it’s really peaceful when you can’t understand what anybody says. You just tune it out. Haiti, to me, was extremely peaceful.”

At the time of his sojourn to Haiti, most of the country was celebrating the one year anniversary of Jean-Bertrand Aristide’s ousting as president. On February 29, 2004, Aristide – Haiti’s first freely elected president in 200 years of independence – was forced into exile for the second time during his presidency.

Maligned by widespread accusations of fabulous corruption, Aristide defiantly insisted he would remain in office until his term officially expired in 2006. But the widespread rebellion which had largely besieged the capital, proved to be too vociferous.

“Haitians say he stole a lot of money, and that he armed his own militias with it. He left because the people were going to kill him; even today, that if he were to return, they would kill him at the airport. This corruption and violence is a tradition in Haiti.”

Through an interpreter, Crowder listened to the political, social, and economic concerns of Haitians, as well as to their prominent anxieties about food and shelter issues.

The suffering of the women and children was particularly distressing to Crowder. Many of them had never seen a green field and they often passed a whole day without a morsel of food. Most were blissfully – or dangerously, really – unaware of the most basic preventative and precautionary tenets of physical and bodily hygiene.

“I heard very little talk about health, because health is on the second tier of necessity. There was no awareness of AIDS or disease, something reflected in the low Haitian life expectancy.”

Upon returning to the United States, Crowder began to sketch the faces of the men, women, and children he’d met and formed relationships with when in Haiti – the results of which are an emotional expression of the reverences of memory. In contrast to the research aspect of the venture, he developed a series of penetratingly and exquisitely detailed portraits depicting the diversity of humanity.

“People are what drive each work of art. Drawing becomes a time of reflection and thought; a time to pause and become aware of the beauty and power that is present around me. I consider all my work part of my “Pause” series… the moments of potential and influence that did not slip by.

A few years ago, Crowder traveled to the Philippines, where he stayed at the Davidson Orphanage in Bayombong, Luzon, 5 hours north of Manila. While there, he also volunteered and witnessed the work of a local feeding program in Cebu. From his experiences in the Philippines, he “developed a desire to learn and experience cultures that were different than my own.”

“I’ve learned from traveling to the Philippines and to Haiti, that everybody on a certain level has something that we can learn and grow from. Here we are so conscious of who we are, what we wear, how we talk, how we are perceived, and over there, it’s not like that. You see who they are. It’s not an issue of trust or deception.”

Crowder’s art is the culmination of his interests in creation, humanity, self-exploration, meditation and spirituality. Ink drawing is his medium of preference, and he extols the virtues of its permanence and purposefulness of application. The process of using ink requires thoughtful decision making, and he finds that ink art is always intentional, deliberate, and well thought out, ensuring artistic accountability.

Stemming from memories derived looking at photographs of memories, all subjects are men, women, and children of personal significance “capturing and immortalizing the people that had an impact on me in my life.”

Crowder needed to be spontaneous when photographing Haitians, most of whom have a culturally based suspiciousness of, if not aversion to, the permanence of its imagery. “Since Haitians are people of the voodoo religion, they didn’t want their picture taken. People were very standoffish about photos. We used the cheapest digital camera you could find. I tried to make something reflective of the history of the conversations and events of the trip. I ended up with around 16 drawings for a series put together in 2007. It was a good way to reflect on the people and what we saw. But it wasn’t the intention.”

Crowder approached each drawing with extreme care, making certain that he was accurately depicting the true composition and likeness of the profile, in an attempt to get the drawing to not only look similar to the person, but to somehow feel like the person. Realism and emotion needed to be combined with compassionate delicacy.

“For each drawing I kept, I probably threw away three or four,” says Crowder. “One of the challenges I like about portraiture, is that I want the eyes to communicate emotion, and to reflect the general personality. You don’t see the technique, but the emotion.”

Dignity is the common thread binding together subject and profile, artist and audience, and it manifests in Crowder’s artistic aptitude, which has the interpretive strength to inspire and emote with faces and expressions of inscrutability, disenchantment, and withdrawnness.

“The authenticity is real, whether it’s fear, anger, or sadness,” says Crowder. “It would’ve been easy to have just seen the tragedy that was everywhere, but I have tried to present something else through my portraits.”

BACK



If you have any questions, please Contact Us or phone (406-375-8580). © Copyright Clark Fork Journal. All rights reserved.